Copyright And Intellectual Considerations †Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Copyright And Intellectual Considerations? Answer: Introducation The importance of copyright was always there but day by day it has become of paramount importance due to growth and development of new media where intellectual property could be generated and also published. Copyright is defined as the exclusive assignable legal right that is enjoyed by the creator or the original owner of a particular piece of intellectual property. The protection by copyright provides exclusive rights to the owner to enjoy all sorts of fame and financial reward resulting from this invention of creation and hence it will be illegal if anyone tries to plagiarize the creation or use it in their own name (Ricketson and Creswell, 2015). This aspects becomes very relevant in the contemporary world of social media and internet as everyday huge volume of data is generated and is used by consumers where unknowingly they infringe copyright rules by not giving the main creator the credit he or she deserves and that is why the case of Courtney an young and ambitious programmer have been taken to analyse and discuss copyright and intellectual property considerations (Bently and Sherman, 2014). In this case it is clear that Courtney is an aspiring and talented programmer who has worked very hard to design a user interface which provides excellent accessibility to the aboriginal community in Australia. With this Courtney has definitely fulfilled the ACS code of ethics and professional conduct. As per the ACS code of ethics Courtney has followed the values of: Primacy of public interest: Here Courtney has developed the user interface which would help the aboriginal communities to work effectively and connect to internet. She has been able to safeguard the interest of aboriginal community in Australia for which she should be appreciated. The enhancement of Quality of Life: With this Courtney is likely to help the aboriginals to lead a quality life (Weckert, 2017). Competence: She has completed the work with competence and has received accolades for her work at the organisation which clearly showed that the stakeholders have been facilitated with this. In Accordance with the ACS code of ethics the professional conduct showed by Courtney is: She analysed the segments impacted by her work and considered the interest of the aboriginals in Australia. She enhanced the quality of life through the development of the user interface recognising their need. Courtney has completed her job competently and diligently following the ethics of competence. Michael clearly did not give Courtney the deserved credit which is against the professional conduct of honesty. Courtney took classes along with office work to upgrade skills and knowledge which fuels professional development (McDermid, 2015). From the critical analysis of the case it could be said that Michael who is Courtneys senior in the office did not act ethically and took all the credits for the work and Courtney remained deprived which is clearly not an ethical act. Recommendations It could be recommended to Courtney that she could sue Michael legally stating the fact of infringement of copyright of intellectual property. As per the Copyright Act 1968 and in support with the Computer Software Protection Report 1994 any person breaching the copyright of intellectual property is liable to be sued by the Australian Legal System. The Similar view has been heard in the Copyright Amendment (Computer Programs) Act 1999 where the person will be able to get license and official ownership of the work, and if it is granted by the organisation the organisation will get it, but no individual apart from the creator will be able to take the credit (Ricketson and Creswell, 2015). References Bently, L. and Sherman, B., 2014.Intellectual property law. Oxford University Press, USA. McDermid, D., 2015.Ethics in ICT: an Australian perspective. Pearson Higher Education AU. Ricketson, S. and Creswell, C., 2015.The law of intellectual property: copyright, designs and confidential information. Thomson Reuters (Professional) Australia Limited. Weckert, J. ed., 2017.Computer ethics. Routledge.